Panama (spwebdesign) wrote,
Panama
spwebdesign

I'm a BBC News Online editor!

Well, sort of. In a recent article of theirs concerning religious symbolism in America, the following sentence appeared: "In addition, even the most secular members of society, and those of other beliefs, concur that Christmas is inextricably linked to the tale of Christ's alleged birth - whether one believes in the immaculate conception or not." Upon seeing that a couple of days ago, I immediately zipped an e-mail off to their editor reporting the factual error and chastising them for their carelessness, for it was clear that they were alluding to Christ's birth, not Mary's.

This is a point that is often misunderstood. According to Christianity, Christ's birth was not the result of an immaculate conception. That was Mary, who was conceived without sin. Christ's birth was a virgin birth.

I received an e-mail saying they would research the issue further. So today, out of curiosity, I checked out the article again. It now states "virgin birth" in place of "immaculate conception."
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments