Panama (spwebdesign) wrote,

Book 29

  1. Grossmith, George & Weedon — The Diary of a Nobody (166 pages)
  2. McCarthy, Cormac — Blood Meridian (334 pages)
  3. Moore, Alan & Dave Gibbons — Watchmen (399 pages)
  4. Moore, Christopher — Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal (507 pages)
  5. Murger, Henri — The Bohemians of the Latin Quarter (381 pages)
  6. Walk with Me: A Lenten Journey of Prayer for 2009 (98 pages)
  7. Douglas, Lloyd C. — The Robe (438 pages)
  8. Robinson, Marilynne — Gilead (281 pages)
  9. Jerome, Jerome K. — Three Men in a Boat (182 pages)
  10. Satrapi, Marjane — Persepolis (343 pages)
  11. Dodge, Jim — Fup (121 pages)
  12. Bauby, Jean-Dominique — The Diving-Bell and the Butterfly (114 pages)
  13. Fleming, Ian — Casino Royale (219 pages)
  14. Blake, Quentin — Clown (30 pages)
  15. Weigel, George — The Courage To Be Catholic (249 pages)
  16. Ishiguro, Kazuo — The Remains of the Day (255 pages)
  17. Orwell, George — Animal Farm (125 pages)
  18. Garner, James Finn — Politically Correct Bedtime Stories (81 pages)
  19. Robinson, Marilynne — Home (339 pages)
  20. Opera Magazine — Basses in Opera: Profiles of thirteen great basses (96 pages)
  21. Beaumarchais, Pierre-Augustin Caron de — The Figaro Trilogy (David Coward, transl.) (335 pages)
  22. Keyes, Daniel — Flowers for Algernon (217 pages)
  23. Bök, Christian — Eunoia (94 pages)
  24. Zweig, Stefan — Chess (76 pages)
  25. Kinney, Jeff — Meet the Wimpy Kid (55 pages)
  26. Lovecraft, H.P. — At the Mountains of Madness (188 pages)
  27. Blatty, William Peter — The Exorcist (307 pages)
  28. Williamson, Jack — Darker Than You Think (266 pages)
  29. Pelevin, Victor — Omon Ra (152 pages)

Page count: 6448.

I picked this up because it was dirt cheap, I recognized the author and title, and I was intrigued by the title and cover page. I told a friend, who immediately reacted negatively. Well, if it was as bad as she suggested, it wasn't a huge commitment in terms of either cost or time spent reading.

And while far from good, it wasn't as bad as my friend implied.

Omon Ra is a satire of the Soviet system (fictionalizing Soviet efforts to reach the moon), and it seemed a bit odd that a book published in 1992 would be satirizing the Soviet government of the 1970s. It just seemed dated. (Kurkov's satires are far more effective because they are current.) I felt at times Pelevin was trying to be a bit much like Joseph Heller and coming well short.

Still, there were moments when the protagonists observations were thought-provoking or the prose evocative. While it failed to attain any great heights (or, indeed, reach the moon), it equally succeeded in avoiding any unfathomable depths.

After a frustrating day at work yesterday, a thought occurred to me on the train: Perhaps this isn't really a satire of the Soviets. No, it's actually a satire of the current worldwide internet scene. The completely absurd and outlandish description of the cosmonaut program captures precisely the sort of thinking that no doubt dominates Microsoft, especially their browser development. Perhaps Pelevin should have made this more obvious.

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment